22 March 2022: Clinical Research
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA) to Guide Personalized Embryo Transfer with Conventional Frozen Embryo Transfer in 281 Chinese Women with Recurrent Implantation Failure
Yan Jia 1BCDEF , Yulin Sha 12BF , Zhu Qiu 1BCD , Yanhua Guo 1CE , Aixiang Tan 1EF , Yan Huang 1EF , Ying Zhong 1EF , Yajun Dong 1ADF* , Hongxia Ye 1ADG*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.935634
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935634
Table 1 Comparison of the baseline patient characteristics between the endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) and conventional frozen embryo transfer (FET) groups.
| Characteristic | ERA group (n=140) | FET group (n=141) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 32.01±2.99 | 31.87±3.21 | >0.05 |
| BMI (kg/m) | 21.21±0.8 | 21.17±0.79 | >0.05 |
| AMH in the fresh cycle (ng/mL) | 4.26±0.71 | 5.12±1.98 | >0.05 |
| FSH in the fresh cycle (IU) | 7.40±1.69 | 7.00±1.67 | >0.05 |
| AFC in the fresh cycle | 16.35±8.19 | 18.25±9.29 | >0.05 |
| Endometrial thickness on the day of embryo transfer (cm) | 0.97±0.11 | 0.95±0.23 | >0.05 |
| Number of attempts with ART | 5.79±0.97 | 6.10±0.83 | >0.05 |
| BMI – body mass index; AMH – anti-Mullerian hormone; FSH – follicle-stimulating hormone; AFC – antral follicle count; ART – assisted reproductive technology. | |||