H-Index
85
Scimago Lab
powered by Scopus
JCR
Clarivate
Analytics
12%
Acceptance
Rate
call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST

Logo

Medical Science Monitor Basic Research
AmJCaseRep

Annals
ISI-Home

eISSN: 1643-3750

Get your full text copy in PDF

Single-Versus Double-Row Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Massive Tears

EnZhi Wang, Liang Wang, Peng Gao, ZhongJi Li, Xiao Zhou, SongGang Wang

(Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, People’s Hospital of Zhangqiu, Zhangqiu, Shandong, China (mainland))

Med Sci Monit 2015; 21:1556-1561

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.893058


Background: It is a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons to treat massive rotator cuff tears. The optimal management of massive rotator cuff tears remains controversial. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare arthroscopic single- versus double-row rotator cuff repair with a larger sample size.
Material and Methods: Of the subjects with massive rotator cuff tears, 146 were treated using single-row repair, and 102 were treated using double-row repair. Pre- and postoperative functional outcomes and radiographic images were collected. The clinical outcomes were evaluated for a minimum of 2 years.
Results: No significant differences were shown between the groups in terms of functional outcomes. Regarding the integrity of the tendon, a lower rate of post-treatment retear was observed in patients who underwent double-row repair compared with single-row repair.
Conclusions: The results suggest that double-row repair is relatively superior in shoulder ROM and the strength of tendon compared with single-row repair. Future studies involving more patients in better-designed randomized controlled trials will be required.

Keywords: Arthroscopy - methods, Orthopedic Procedures - methods, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Recurrence, Rotator Cuff - surgery

This paper has been published under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.
I agree