H-Index
79
Scimago Lab
powered by Scopus
JCR
Clarivate
Analytics
15%
Acceptance
Rate
call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST

Logo

Medical Science Monitor Basic Research
AmJCaseRep

Annals
ISI-Home

eISSN: 1643-3750

Get your full text copy in PDF

How to read, understand, and write 'Discussion' sections in medical articles. An exercise in critical thinking.

Milos Jenicek

Med Sci Monit 2006; 12(6): SR28-36

ID: 451279


Writing and reading 'Discussion' sections in medical articles require aprocedure as exact and structured as that involved in raising questions, choosing materials and methodsand producing results for a health research study. The medical article as a whole can be considered anexercise in modern argumentation and its 'Discussion' section, a systematic critical appraisal of a pathfrom theses to conclusions. The methodology of modern critical thinking applies perfectly to articlewriting, reading, and understanding. Structuring the 'Discussion' section as a review of argumentationbenefits more than the study and its authors. It allows the reader to grasp the real relevance and validityof the study and its usability for his or her decision-making in clinical and community care, researchand health policies and program proposal, implementation, and evaluation.

This paper has been published under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.
I agree