Scimago Lab
powered by Scopus
call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST


Medical Science Monitor Basic Research


eISSN: 1643-3750

Get your full text copy in PDF

Long-term assessment of pulmonary function tests in pediatric survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome

Gideon Paret, Zohar Barzilay, Osnat Moreh, Ran Harel, Ron Ben-Abraham, Avi A Weinbroum, Arie Augarten, Ori Efrati, Hector Roizin

Med Sci Monit 2002; 8(3): CR153-157

ID: 420911

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate long-term pulmonary functiontests in pediatric survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). MATERIAL/METHODS: Observationalstudy based on a telephone poll of retrospectively identified post ARDS children who were hospitalizedin a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in a general 1200-bed teaching, tertiary, regional referralcenter for children. RESULTS: Follow-up pulmonary function tests were achieved in only 7 children, witha mean age of 7.3±4.3 years (range 3-12) and following 5.6±4.3 years after PICU discharge. The etiologyfor ARDS included: lymphoma (n=2), pneumonia (n=2), aspiration (n=1), petrol ingestion (n=1) and snakeenvenomation (n=1). The children had been ventilated for 9.4±7.3 days and their worst PaO2/FiO2 ratiowas 65.1±17.0 mm Hg. The follow-up pulmonary functions in all the children was within normal limitsexcept for one child who had mildly reduced DLCO and one who had mild exercise-induced hypoxemia (oxyhemoglobinsaturation of 94%). Neither of the two nor the others showed subjective symptoms or clinical physicallimitations. CONCLUSIONS: Children who survive ARDS apparently enjoy long-term normal pulmonary function.Some, however, may present subclinical dysfunction that persists for many years after the acute episodeand evoked only by sophisticated lung tests.

This paper has been published under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.
I agree