22 January 2022>: Clinical Research
A Questionnaire-Based Study to Obtain a Consensus from 5 Polish Burns Centers on Eschar Removal by Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement (Nexobrid) in Burns Following the 2020 Updated European Consensus Guidelines
Tomasz Korzeniowski 12ABCDEFG* , Jerzy Strużyna 13ACDEFG , Anna M. Chrapusta 4ABCDE , Andrzej Krajewski 5ABDE , Marek Kucharzewski 6ABDEF , Krzysztof Piorun 5ABCE , Jakub Nowakowski 7BCDF , Agnieszka Surowiecka 1ACDE , Magdalena Kozicka 12ABDF , Kamil Torres 12BDEGDOI: 10.12659/MSM.935632
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935632
Table 1 Consensus statements and agreement on indications and usage of enzymatic debridement.
No | Statement | Agreement | Likert scale | Consensus |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Enzymatic debridement is one of the early eschar removal methods for burns | 100% | 5/5 strongly agree | Yes |
2 | Nexobrid-based enzymatic debridement is a safe tool as long as is it used by an experienced burn team | 100% | 4/5 strongly agree1/5 agree | Yes |
3 | Enzymatic debridement is not recommended for use in chemical or electrical burns | 100% | 3/5 strongly agree1/5 agree1/5 somewhat agree | Yes |
4 | Enzymatic debridement is particularly beneficial in treating burns of the upper limbs, including the arms, as well as the face and the groin | 100% | 4/5 strongly agree1/5 agree | Yes |
5 | Enzymatic debridement can be used in extensive burns but needs to be restricted to 15% of the body surface area per session | 100% | 4/5 strongly agree1/5 agree | Yes |
6 | Given the selective nature of enzymatic debridement, it is recommended for use particularly in treatment of mixed deep dermal and full-thickness burns | 100% | 5/5 strongly agree | Yes |
7 | Using enzymatic debridement as a means of early removal of eschar in circumferential burns allows avoidance of surgical escharotomy | 100% | 4/5 strongly agree1/5 agree | Yes |
8 | Enzymatic debridement can be particularly useful in cases of limited access to hospital resources, such as in mass disasters | 80% | 4/5 strongly agree1/5 disagree | No |