26 May 2021>: Clinical Research
A Study of Blended Learning Using the Smart Class Teaching Module on Psychosocial Dysfunction Course During the Training of Undergraduate Occupational Therapy Students in China
Qiang Lin 1234CDEF* , Yaxian Qiu 123CDEF* , Yanni Zhang 123BCD , Yuxing Zheng 123BCD , Lingzi Zhang 5CD , Junjie Liang 123BC , Yilifate Anniwaer 12E , Yujun Liao 12C , Yueyi Jiang 2B , Shijuan Lang 123B , Wanqi Zhuang 2B , Siyi Luo 2B , Meifeng Zheng 123B , QingHua Yan 6CDEF* , Ke Chen 7CDE* , Qiuxia Chen 8CDEF* , Haining Ou 1234ADEG*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.931748
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e931748
Table 2 The differences in course scores between the 2 types of teaching modules.
The Smart Class teaching module | The Traditional Class teaching module | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Assignment score | 86.25±2.67 | 83.17±4.43 | |
Practical exam score | 86.00±1.75 | 82.83±5.75 | |
Written exam score | 74.00±7.15 | 75.88±10.39 | 0.534 |
Final score | 77.63±5.16 | 78.00±8.25 | 0.874 |
The higher assignment score and practical exam score in the Smart Class teaching module group than those in the Traditional Class teaching module group. Values are presented as a number or mean±standard deviation. Statistical significance was set as |