17 January 2021: Clinical Research
The Smart Class Teaching Module for Rehabilitation Medicine English Education in China
Qiang Lin 1234ACDEF , Yaxian Qiu 12CDE , Junjie Liang 123CD , Yuxin Zheng 123C , Yujun Liao 12B , Huina Huang 12B , Lingying Hou 12B , Shijuan Lang 123DF , Biyi Zhao 1C , Zulipiya Yiming 1C , Qinghua Yan 5BCD* , Haining Ou 1234ADG* , Yanni Zhang 123ABCDG*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.929834
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e929834
Table 3 Questionnaire results according to teaching module and by gender.
| Questionnaire Item | Teaching module | Gender | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Class teaching module | Smart Class teaching module | P-value | Male | Female | P-value | |
| I Course attractive | 3.38±0.64 | 3.71±0.70 | 0.418 | 3.35±0.65 | 3.33±0.69 | 0.827 |
| II Teaching effect | 3.15±0.59 | 3.08±0.71 | 0.457 | 3.10±0.62 | 3.12±0.68 | 0.846 |
| III Academic load | 3.02±0.65 | 2.64±0.54 | 2.72±0.60 | 2.86±0.63 | 0.095 | |
| Question 15 | 3.35±0.86 | 2.82±0.83 | 2.91±0.85 | 3.13±0.90 | 0.337 | |
| Question 16 | 2.84±0.82 | 2.50±0.78 | 2.62±0.81 | 2.66±0.82 | 0.942 | |
| IV Course resources | 3.17±0.70 | 3.10±0.76 | 0.772 | 3.06±0.77 | 3.14±0.71 | 0.480 |
| V Course improvement | 3.55±0.70 | 3.55±0.62 | 0.955 | 3.47±0.60 | 3.60±0.68 | 0.149 |
| Values are presented as a number or mean (±standard deviation). Statistical significance was set as | ||||||