09 October 2020>: Clinical Research
Comparison Between Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy and Fenestration in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Yang Zhang ABCDEF* , Hengjie Zhu ABCDEF* , Zheng Zhou BCDEF , Jixiang Wu BCDEF , Yinming Sun BCD , Xiang Shen BCDE , Chengcun Li BCDEF*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.926631
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e926631
Table 2 General clinical results in the fenestration and PTED groups.
Clinical | Fenestration (n=94) | PTED (n=94) | P |
---|---|---|---|
Incision length (cm) | 3.57±0.75 | 0.82±0.32 | |
Blood loss (mL) | 115.32±11.46 | 49.63±5.86 | |
Operative time (min) | 66.32±15.32 | 68.75±11.56 | 0.085 |
Hospital stay (days) | 2.55±0.71 | 4.62±0.83 | |
Complication rate | 3 (3.2%) | 3 (3.2%) | >1.000 |
PTED – percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression. All data were compared using a test. |