27 September 2020>: Clinical Research
Comparison of Effectiveness of Routine Antenatal Care with a Midwife-Managed Clinic Service in Prevention of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Early Pregnancy at a Hospital in China
Jingbo Qiu 1ACE , Ying Liu 1BF , Wei Zhu 1ADEG* , Chen Zhang 2DDOI: 10.12659/MSM.925991
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e925991
Table 4 Effect of intervention on GDM and other pregnancy outcomes by IVF.
Variable | Intervention (N=279) | Control (N=280) | P |
---|---|---|---|
GDM [n (%)] | |||
No-IVF | 96 (37.8) | 128 (49.0) | 0.01* |
IVF | 19 (76.0) | 13 (68.4) | 0.58 |
Maternal hypertension [n (%)] | |||
No-IVF | 21 (8.3) | 32 (12.3) | 0.14 |
IVF | 3 (12.0) | 1 (5.3) | 0.44 |
Preterm delivery ( | |||
No-IVF | 12 (4.7) | 10 (3.8) | 0.62 |
IVF | 5 (20.0) | 1 (5.3) | 0.16 |
PROM [n (%)] | |||
No-IVF | 58 (22.8) | 53 (20.3) | 0.49 |
IVF | 7 (28.0) | 1 (5.3) | 0.06 |
GBS [n (%)] | |||
No-IVF | 15 (5.9) | 12 (4.6) | 0.51 |
IVF | 3 (12.0) | 1 (5.3) | 0.44 |
Thyroid disease [n (%)] | |||
No-IVF | 23 (9.1) | 14 (5.4) | 0.11 |
IVF | 2 (8.0) | 1 (5.3) | 0.72 |
* Odds ratio 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.47–0.86; adjusted age, BMI, parity. |