16 October 2020>: Clinical Research
Evaluation of Periodontal Phenotypes Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Intraoral Scanning by Computer-Aided Design, and Prosthetic-Driven Implant Planning Technology
Magdalena Bednarz-Tumidajewicz 1AB , Aleksandra Sender-Janeczek 2EF , Jacek Zborowski 2CDE , Tomasz Gedrange 3DEF , Tomasz Konopka 2CDE , Agata Prylińska-Czyżewska 4BCD , Elżbieta Dembowska 5EFG* , Wojciech Bednarz 12ABCDOI: 10.12659/MSM.924469
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e924469
Table 4 Frequency and distribution of dento-gingival units in groups N and W depending on the free gingival thickness values (Chi-square test).
n | FGT ≤0.7 mm | FGT >0.7 mm ≤1.0 mm | FGT >1 mm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
N | 54 | 33 | 61.11% | 20 | 37.04% | 1 | 1.85% |
W | 126 | 42 | 33.33% | 72 | 57.14% | 12 | 9.52% |
FGT – free gingival thickness; N – narrow group; n – number of teeth; W – wide group. |