16 October 2020>: Clinical Research
Evaluation of Periodontal Phenotypes Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Intraoral Scanning by Computer-Aided Design, and Prosthetic-Driven Implant Planning Technology
Magdalena Bednarz-Tumidajewicz 1AB , Aleksandra Sender-Janeczek 2EF , Jacek Zborowski 2CDE , Tomasz Gedrange 3DEF , Tomasz Konopka 2CDE , Agata Prylińska-Czyżewska 4BCD , Elżbieta Dembowska 5EFG* , Wojciech Bednarz 12ABCDOI: 10.12659/MSM.924469
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e924469
Table 3 Average values of gingival thickness at 3 measurement points within the teeth 13–23 using CAD/CBCT including division into two phenotype groups.
Tooth | NMean±SD or M (25Q÷75Q) [mm] | WMean±SD or M (25Q÷75Q) [mm] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGT | SGT | CGT | FGT | SGT | CGT | |
Teeth 13–23 | 0.74±0.13 | 1.46±0.31 | 0.79±0.25 | 0.84±0.20 | 1.63±0.31 | 0.91±0.24 |
Central incisors | 0.80 (0.70÷0.90) | 1.60 (1.50÷1.70) | 0.90 (0.60÷1.00) | 0.90 (0.80÷0.90) | 1.70 (1.60÷1.90) | 1.00 (0.90÷1.20) |
Lateral incisors | 0.70 (0.60÷0.80) | 1.60 (1.20÷1.70) | 0.70 (0.70÷0.90) | 0.80 (0.70÷1.0) | 1.65 (1.50÷1.90) | 0.90 (0.80÷1.10) |
Canines | 0.70 (0.55÷0.70) | 1.40 (1.20÷1.40) | 0.70 (0.60÷0.80) | 0.75 (0.60÷0.80) | 1.40 (1.30÷1.60) | 0.80 (0.60÷0.90) |