29 June 2020: Clinical Research
Clinical Efficacy of Combined Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Surgery and Reversible Ligation of the Uterine Artery for Excision and Repair of Uterine Scar in Patients with Type II and III Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
Lina Huang ABEF , Lingjun Zhao BCD , Huiwei Shi ABC*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.924076
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e924076
Table 4 Comparison of outcome measures with different surgical methods in patients with type III CSP.
| Groups | A1 | B1 | C1 | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 16 | 21 | 27 | – | |
| Intraoperative bleeding volume (ml) | 110 (100–157.5) | 180 (100–200) | 150 (100–200) | 0.146 | |
| Postoperative hospital stay (days) | 5 (5–5.75) | 5 (4.5–5.5) | 5 (4–6) | 0.916 | |
| Time of serum β-HCG returning to normal (days) | 24 (18.75–24.75) | 35 (22.5–42)* | 35 (27–39)* | ||
| Postoperative residual lesion (n) | Yes | 0 | 8 | 10 | 0.015 |
| Number of cases (n) | No | 16 | 13 | 17 | |
| Absorption time of residual lesion (days) | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–50.0)* | 0 (0–54.0)* | 0.014 | |
| Postoperative thickness of uterine scar (mm) | 3.8 (3.5–4.375) | 2 (1.8–2)* | 2 (1.6–2.2)* | ||
| Recovery time of menstruation (days) | 43.5 (36–47.75) | 52 (39–66)* | 49 (40–60)* | 0.012 | |
| The continuous data did not meet the normal distribution, and the H test was used. * P | |||||