Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

06 July 2020: Clinical Research

Comparison on the Efficacy of Double Tract Gastric Interposition Reconstruction Versus Jejunal Interposition Reconstruction After Proximal Gastrectomy

Chao Yue A* , Rui Peng B* , Wei Wei D , Bin Zhou F , Xu Wen F , Rongmin Gu G , Xuezhi Ming B , Gang Li E* , Huanqiu Chen E*

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.922504

Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e922504

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients in ADJR group and ADGR group.

VariablesADJR (n=32)ADGR (n=30)P
Age (years, χ̄±s)64.87±6.7266.23±8.750.064
Gender (Male/Female)21/1123/70.338
BMI (kg/m, χ̄±s)21.19±2.1020.67±2.560.384
TNM stage, n (%)0.455
 Ia23 (71.88%)24 (80.00%)
 Ib4 (12.50%)3 (10.00%)
 IIa3 (9.38%)1 (3.33%)
 IIb1 (3.13%)1 (3.33%)
 IIIa1 (3.13%)0 (0.00%)
 IIIb0 (0.00%)1 (3.33%)
Hb (g/dL, χ̄±s)12.30±0.7012.10±0.800.296
TP (g/dL, χ̄±s)6.78±0.206.70±0.180.097
ADGR – antrum-preserving double tract gastric interposition reconstruction; ADJR – antrum-preserving double tract jejunal interposition reconstruction; BMI – body mass index; Hb – hemoglobin; TP – total protein.

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750