16 September 2020 : Database Analysis
Outcomes for Patients with Sepsis Following Admission to the Intensive Care Unit Based on Health Insurance Status: A Study from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III (MIMIC-III) DatabaseYing Zhou1ABCDEF*, Di Yang2BCE, Qiang Fu2E, Tao Chen1E, Yong Chen1E, Chuandong Zheng1EG
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e924954
BACKGROUND: Previous research has focused on poor outcomes from a lack of insurance, but the effects of different types of insurance for patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU) have not been well studied. We aimed to investigate whether private health insurance was better than government-run health insurance in the United States in terms of clinical outcomes of patients with sepsis in the ICU.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with sepsis were identified from the Medical information Mart for Intensive Care-III database. Patients were grouped as having private and government-run health insurance. Clinical outcomes were compared in univariate and multivariate analyses. Propensity score match (PSM) and subgroup analysis were used to check the robustness of results.
RESULTS: Data from 13,957 patients were extracted. After adjustment by multivariate model, the private insurance group had similar rates of ICU mortality (relative risk [RR] [95% confidence interval CI]=1.052 [0.919–1.205], P=.463) and 90-day (RR [95% CI]=.964 [0.885–1.051], P=.406) compared with the group with government-run insurance. The private insurance group had longer ICU stays (strictly standardized mean difference=0.092, P<.001) and better long-term survival (hazard ratio [95% CI]=0.875 [0.825–0.928], P<.001) than the government-run insurance group in the PSM cohorts. Subgroup analysis indicated little variation in results for specific conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with sepsis who had private insurance had longer ICU stays but similar ICU mortality and 90-day mortality rates than similar patients with government-run insurance; they seemed to have better long-term survival, but more evidence may be required to support this conclusion.
Keywords: database, Hospital Mortality, Insurance, Major Medical, propensity score, Sepsis, Survival Rate
25 October 2021 : EditorialEditorial: The 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines on the Real-World Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD)
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e935172
22 October 2021 : Clinical ResearchA Novel Method for the Production of an Autologous Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Catabolic Product (Cytorich) ...
Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.934365
11 October 2021 : Clinical ResearchClinical Features and Temporal Lung Radiographic Changes in 25 Patients Recovering from COVID-19 Pneumonia:...
Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.933381
08 September 2021 : Clinical ResearchAcceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...
Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.932788
27 Oct 2021 : Clinical ResearchUse of the Braden Scale to Predict Injury Severity in Mass Burn Casualties
Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.934039
27 Oct 2021 : Database AnalysisLow Expression of Long Noncoding RNA SLC26A4 Antisense RNA 1 Is an Independent Prognostic Biomarker and Cor...
Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.934522
27 Oct 2021 : Database AnalysisA Novel Predictive Model Incorporating Ferroptosis-Related Gene Signatures for Overall Survival in Patients...
Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.934050
Most Viewed Current Articles
20 Mar 2020 : Clinical ResearchSocial Capital and Sleep Quality in Individuals Who Self-Isolated for 14 Days During the Coronavirus Diseas...
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e923921
15 Apr 2020 : Clinical ResearchPsychological Impact and Coping Strategies of Frontline Medical Staff in Hunan Between January and March 20...
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e924171
05 May 2020 : Review articleAn Evidence Based Perspective on mRNA-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Development
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e924700