04 June 2014 : Original article
Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for secondary common bile duct stones compared with laparoscopic trans-cystic common bile duct explorationPeixin LiABCDEF, Zhongtao ZhangACD, Jianshe LiAB, Lan JinB, Wei HanAC, Jie ZhangB
Med Sci Monit 2014; 20:920-926
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in preoperative patients with secondary common bile duct stones during the application of laparoscopic trans-cystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The clinical records of 255 patients were retrospectively analyzed. All patients included in the study were examined by MRCP 3 days prior to LTCBDE.
RESULTS: Secondary bile duct stones were detected in 220 patients using LTCBDE. Of the patients diagnosed by MRCP, 141 were true-positive, 28 were true-negative, 7 were false-positive and 79 were false-negative. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MRCP for secondary common bile duct stones were 64.09%, 80.00%, 66.27%, 95.27%, and 26.17%, respectively. When the cases with muddy stones were excluded, the outcomes were 80.41%, 79.41%, 69.23%, 94.44%, and 48.21%, respectively. When cases with stones <3 mm (inclusive) in diameter were excluded, the outcomes were 93.75%, 79.41%, 86.27%, 93.75%, and 65.85%, respectively. When cases with stones <5 mm (inclusive) in diameter were excluded, the outcomes were 93.10%, 79.41%, 89.26%, 92.05%, and 81.82%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of preoperative MRCP is overestimated for the diagnosis of secondary common bile duct stones, particularly for muddy and micro-stones.
Keywords: Adult, Adolescent, Aged, 80 and over, Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Common Bile Duct - surgery, False Positive Reactions, Gallstones - surgery, young adult
This Week Editorial
02 August 2021 : EditorialEditorial: The National COVID Cohort Collaborative Consortium Combines Population Data with Machine Learning to Evaluate and Predict Risk Factors for the Severity of COVID-19
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e934171
30 July 2021 : Clinical ResearchRural and Female Patients with Old Myocardial Infarction Lacked Knowledge and Preventive Measures During th...
Med Sci Monit In Press :: DOI: 10.12659/MSM.928512
16 July 2021 : Review articleSilent Hypoxemia in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Review
Med Sci Monit In Press :: DOI: 10.12659/MSM.930776
09 July 2021 : Database AnalysisA Simple Clinical Prediction Tool for COVID-19 in Primary Care with Epidemiology: Temperature-Leukocytes-CT...
Med Sci Monit In Press :: DOI: 10.12659/MSM.931467
03 Aug 2021 : Clinical ResearchComparison of Outcomes Following TiRobot-Assisted Sacroiliac Screw Fixation with Bone Grafting and Traditio...
Med Sci Monit In Press :: DOI: 10.12659/MSM.932724
02 Aug 2021 : Database AnalysisRNA N6-Methyladenosine Patterns in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Reveal a Distinct Immune Infiltration Landscape...
Med Sci Monit In Press :: DOI: 10.12659/MSM.930994
02 Aug 2021 : Clinical ResearchVitamin D Receptor Is a Sepsis-Susceptibility Gene in Chinese Children
Med Sci Monit In Press :: DOI: 10.12659/MSM.932518
20 Mar 2020 : Clinical ResearchSocial Capital and Sleep Quality in Individuals Who Self-Isolated for 14 Days During the Coronavirus Diseas...
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e923921
15 Apr 2020 : Clinical ResearchPsychological Impact and Coping Strategies of Frontline Medical Staff in Hunan Between January and March 20...
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e924171
05 May 2020 : Review articleAn Evidence Based Perspective on mRNA-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Development
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e924700