30 June 2011
Limitations of Rituximab/IVIg desensitization protocol in kidney transplantation; Is this better than a tincture of time?
Tomasz KozlowskiABCDEF, Kenneth A. AndreoniCDEFAnn Transplant 2011; 16(2): 19-25 :: ID: 881860
Abstract
Background: A plasmapheresis-free protocol for desensitization of donor kidney transplant candidates with high Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody (CPRA) was initiated at our center. The protocol was adopted from previously published work by Vo, Jordan et al.
Material/Methods: Five patients with CPRA of 94±18%, awaiting kidney transplant from living or deceased donors received rituximab (1 g × 2 doses) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG 2 g/kg × 2 doses) without plasmapheresis. Levels of donor specific antibodies (DSA) and T/B cell crossmatches were followed using solid phase flow cytometry.
Results: Three out of 5 patients were sensitized only to Class II HLA antigens. All patients had very high levels of alloantibodies before initiation of the treatment. All of the candidates initially demonstrated reduced levels of HLA antibody, but statistical significance was only obtained in one patient Class II antibody and in another only for Class I. Depletion was transient with observed antibody rebound. Rituximab effectively depleted CD20 cells in peripheral blood. None of the patients were transplanted due to persistently high levels of antibody and strong positive flow cytometry crossmatches. Under this protocol, reduction of HLA antibodies in patients with high levels was insufficient.
Conclusions: Highly allo-sensitized patients with a CPRA above 85% may not benefit from a combination of rituximab-IVIG alone. The previously published protocol does not help all patients achieve an acceptable crossmatch. An individualized approach to the treatment of highly sensitized patients is still required.
Keywords: limitations of desensitization, Kidney, Transplantation, rituximab, IVIG
In Press
08 Mar 2024 : Original article
Association of Coronary Calcium Score on Cardiac PET During Pre-Kidney Transplant Assessment with Persisten...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.943532
14 Mar 2024 : Original article
Impact of Blood Products Transfusion on Patients in the Immediate Post-Lung Transplant Period: A Cohort StudyAnn Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.943652
14 Mar 2024 : Case report
Treatment of Cavernous Transformation of Portal Vein Caused by Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis Using Ex Vivo ...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.942358
15 Mar 2024 : Review article
Approaches and Challenges in the Current Management of Cytomegalovirus in Transplant Recipients: Highlighti...Ann Transplant In Press; DOI: 10.12659/AOT.941185
Most Viewed Current Articles
05 Apr 2022 : Original article
Impact of Statins on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living-Donor Liver TransplantationDOI :10.12659/AOT.935604
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935604
12 Jan 2022 : Original article
Risk Factors for Developing BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study of ...DOI :10.12659/AOT.934738
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e934738
22 Nov 2022 : Original article
Long-Term Effects of Everolimus-Facilitated Tacrolimus Reduction in Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipient...DOI :10.12659/AOT.937988
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e937988
15 Mar 2022 : Case report
Combined Liver, Pancreas-Duodenum, and Kidney Transplantation for Patients with Hepatitis B Cirrhosis, Urem...DOI :10.12659/AOT.935860
Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e935860