01 October 2007
Comparison of contamination between conventional three-way stopcock and needleless injection device: A randomized controlled trial
Jun Oto, Masaji Nishimura, Hiroshi Morimatsu, Hiroshi Katayama, Mutsuo Onodera, Hideo Takahashi, Jun TakezawaMed Sci Monit 2007; 13(10): CR417-421 :: ID: 502351
Abstract
Background: Intraluminal contamination of catheter hubs has been recognized as the most frequent cause of catheter-related blood stream infections. We have investigated the efficacy of a new hub device, Planecta SC® (PNSC), in preventing endoluminal catheter contamination, compared to a conventional three-way stopcock.
Material/Methods: Adults patients requiring an intravascular catheter placement for at least 48 hours in intensive care units were randomly assigned to receive either the infusion device with the newly designed hub, PNSC (P group, n=89), or with a conventional three-way stopcock (C group, n=73). To evaluate intraluminal contamination, we examined the bacteria isolated in the inline bacterial filters which were attached to downstream of the injection ports. In addition to the clinical study, we conducted a bench study to investigate if use of protection caps or strict disinfection technique prevented intraluminal contamination with this new needleless connector.
Results: The incidence of bacterial contamination was not significantly different between the groups (P group 9/89 (10.1%) vs. C group 6/73 (8.2%), P=0.79). There was no correlation between the numbers of injections, duration of the use of the device or the microbial contamination rate. In the bench study, protection caps and disinfection technique significantly decreased microbial transfer from the hub to the fluid space.
Conclusions: We concluded that the use of the new hub device did not reduce endoluminal bacterial contamination rate in comparison with that of a three way stopcock. Intraluminal bacterial contamination may be reduced by either strict disinfection technique or when a protection cap is use.
Keywords: Aged, 80 and over, Bacteria - isolation & purification, Disinfection, Equipment Contamination, Filtration, Infusions, Intravenous, Injections, Needles - microbiology
Editorial
01 April 2024 : Editorial
Editorial: Forty Years of Waiting for Prevention and Cure of HIV Infection – Ongoing Challenges and Hopes for Vaccine Development and Overcoming Antiretroviral Drug ResistanceDOI: 10.12659/MSM.944600
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944600
In Press
06 Mar 2024 : Clinical Research
Comparison of Outcomes between Single-Level and Double-Level Corpectomy in Thoracolumbar Reconstruction: A ...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943797
21 Mar 2024 : Meta-Analysis
Economic Evaluation of COVID-19 Screening Tests and Surveillance Strategies in Low-Income, Middle-Income, a...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943863
10 Apr 2024 : Clinical Research
Predicting Acute Cardiovascular Complications in COVID-19: Insights from a Specialized Cardiac Referral Dep...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.942612
06 Mar 2024 : Clinical Research
Enhanced Surgical Outcomes of Popliteal Cyst Excision: A Retrospective Study Comparing Arthroscopic Debride...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.941102
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387
01 Jan 2022 : Editorial
Editorial: Current Status of Oral Antiviral Drug Treatments for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Non-Hospitalized Pa...DOI :10.12659/MSM.935952
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935952