01 July 1997
Med Sci Monit 1997; 3(4): PI594-598 :: ID: 501456
In view of the increasing number of in vitro tests of thyroid function standardization of the biochemical assessment of patients with suspected thyroid disease was attempted. In 145 patients, measurements were made of serum total triiodothyronine (T3), tyroxine (T4) and thyrotropin (TSH) by the highly sensitive methods using the Delfia system. For comparative purposes, Delfia results were compared with those obtained by three different immunoassays: RIA, LIA and FPIA. The correlation between all tested methods over a wide range of concentrations was good, indicating very close agreement in the ranking of results. Correlation coefficients in all cases were higher than 0.90 and the intercepts did not differ significantly from zero. On the basis of the obtained results, the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic power of the total T3, total T4 and TSH measurements for discrimination between euthyroid, hypothyroid and hyperthyroid patients was determined. TSH assay showed the highest sensitivity and diagnostic power as compared to total T3 and T4 assays. A significant, negative correlation was found in all studied patients population between TSH and T3 and TSH and T4 (r = -0.564 and r -0.695 respectively). These results seems to suggest that: 1) a detectable, normal TSH level indicates that the patient is euthyroid, and 2) a raised or lowered TSH level should be followed by measurement of T4 rather than T3 to distinguish between euthyroism and hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism. This study also suggests that for practical purposes the best single screening test of thyroid function is TSH measured with a sensitive immunometric assay.
Keywords: Thyroid function, in vitro thyroid testing, immunoassays
01 December 2021 : EditorialEditorial: SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Responses and Breakthrough COVID-19
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e935624
03 December 2021 : Laboratory ResearchInfluenza and Influenza-Like Respiratory Virus Infections in Children During the 2019/20 Influenza Season a...
Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.934862
08 November 2021 : Database AnalysisVirtual Screening and Molecular Docking to Study the Mechanism of Chinese Medicines in the Treatment of Cor...
Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.934102
01 November 2021 : EditorialEditorial: What Can be Learned from National and International Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Systems Duri...
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935299
07 Dec 2021 : Review articleA Review of the Impact of Neutrophils and Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) on the Development of Aorti...
Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.935134
07 Dec 2021 : Review articleAdie’s Pupil: A Diagnostic Challenge for the Physician
Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.934657
06 Dec 2021 : Animal ResearchAstragalus Flavone Induces Proliferation and Differentiation of Neural Stem Cells in a Cerebral Infarction ...
Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.933830
Most Viewed Current Articles
20 Mar 2020 : Clinical ResearchSocial Capital and Sleep Quality in Individuals Who Self-Isolated for 14 Days During the Coronavirus Diseas...
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e923921
15 Apr 2020 : Clinical ResearchPsychological Impact and Coping Strategies of Frontline Medical Staff in Hunan Between January and March 20...
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e924171
05 May 2020 : Review articleAn Evidence Based Perspective on mRNA-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Development
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e924700