H-Index
70
Scimago Lab
powered by Scopus
Clarivate
Analytics
Formerly the IP & Science
business of Thomson Reuters

Logo




eISSN: 1643-3750

Get your full text copy in PDF

Diagnostic value of conventional arthrography in investigating post-traumatic ulnar wrist pain: Are MRI and MR arthrography always necessary?

Konstantinos J. Kazakos, Konstantinos C. Xarchas, Miltiades K. Ziogas, Dimitrios J. Kehagias, Dionysios A. Verettas

Med Sci Monit 2008; 14(4): CS37-40

ID: 850305


Background:    Ulnar wrist pain is a difficult problem to diagnose and treat. Many diagnostic methods can be used, each having its own value, but the surgeon should know which is the simplest and most appropriate for each case.
    Case Report:    Such a case, investigated adequately by conventional arthrography is presented. A review of the relevant literature and a discussion of whether conventional MR and MR arthrography are always necessary or not is provided.
    Conclusions:    MR arthrography does not need be performed in every case of ulnar wrist pain, this depending on the findings of conventional arthrography, an opinion that has also been confirmed by the authors’ own previous experience.

This paper has been published under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.
I agree