01 March 2006
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: An independent assessment of outcomesin a difficult patient population.
Bradley K. Weiner, Hoan-Vu Nguyen, S. Will HazardMed Sci Monit 2006; 12(3): CR99-102 :: ID: 447105
Abstract
Background: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is becoming increasinglypopular for the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative conditions. However, the outcomes followingthe procedure have only begun to be evaluated. Material/Methods: The authors reviewed all patients previouslytreated by TLIF at our tertiary center with minimum two year follow-up. Between 1997 and 2001, twenty-sevenpatients underwent the procedure. They were evaluated clinically and radiographically at regular intervalsfor a minimum two years following surgery and longer term follow-up was carried out by telephone interview.Long-term follow-up was undertaken by an independent assessor (a spine surgeon not directly involvedin the patient's care) and outcomes were assessed using the measure designed by Macnab/McCulloch/An.Follow-up averaged 30 months and ranged from 24 to 42 months. Results: All but two patients obtaineda solid radiographic arthrodesis and complications were few. However, only eleven patients obtained excellentor good clinical results, while 16 had fair or poor outcomes. Conclusions: TLIF is a technically demandingprocedure which can be done with relatively few complications and offers excellent rates of arthrodesis.However, the outcomes of the procedure and indications for the procedure in difficult patient populationsclearly require further study.
Keywords: Diskectomy - statistics & numerical data, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Follow-Up Studies, Laminectomy - statistics & numerical data, Spinal Diseases - surgery, Spinal Fusion - statistics & numerical data, Time Factors
Editorial
01 April 2024 : Editorial
Editorial: Forty Years of Waiting for Prevention and Cure of HIV Infection – Ongoing Challenges and Hopes for Vaccine Development and Overcoming Antiretroviral Drug ResistanceDOI: 10.12659/MSM.944600
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944600
In Press
06 Mar 2024 : Clinical Research
Comparison of Outcomes between Single-Level and Double-Level Corpectomy in Thoracolumbar Reconstruction: A ...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943797
21 Mar 2024 : Meta-Analysis
Economic Evaluation of COVID-19 Screening Tests and Surveillance Strategies in Low-Income, Middle-Income, a...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943863
10 Apr 2024 : Clinical Research
Predicting Acute Cardiovascular Complications in COVID-19: Insights from a Specialized Cardiac Referral Dep...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.942612
06 Mar 2024 : Clinical Research
Enhanced Surgical Outcomes of Popliteal Cyst Excision: A Retrospective Study Comparing Arthroscopic Debride...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.941102
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387
01 Jan 2022 : Editorial
Editorial: Current Status of Oral Antiviral Drug Treatments for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Non-Hospitalized Pa...DOI :10.12659/MSM.935952
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935952